Class State v Mann
On September 27th our class discussed the case of State v Mann. Some arguments from the side of the state was: mann should be charged more due to the fact that he did not shoot Lydia morally and she was not his “property”. Had she died, the State argued that Mann should face charges of murder. Also, shooting someone else’s property is a form of vandalism and the gunshot prohibits Lydia from working to her full potential when back with her original owner. Arguments from the side of Mann were that: by law, slaveholders could be fined for not stopping runaways. Mann did hire Lydia so he had full control of her at the time. Baseline, Mann shot property therefore he cannot be charged with any type of murder. Obviously it is hard for anyone in today's world to be able to put themselves in the shoes of Mann and argue a very obscure argument. It is also hard to realize that these kinds of issues were "resolved" around the time my parents were born and growing up. While all laws ...