Dread Scott

Image result for dred scott caseWhen talking about Dread Scott, our team was split into two groups. Going back and forth between Taney and Curtis, our group discussed the highs and lows of this case. From Taney's perspective, our group said "that in the eyes of the public and their opinion toward the subject matter of African Americans having rights under the constitution is that they are an inferior race and that they should not receive the same social and political rights as the white man". Taney was clearly against the whole blending of races and was a strong believer in segregation. Curtis then said, "Curtis states that Congress shall have the power to make all needed rules and regulations respecting slavery in the territories. He says that when the Constitution was formed, it was recognized that slavery was a subject of 'municipal legislation'." When I first read this I could not clearly devise which side Curtis was on. With both of these men saying these things, it was clear on the point of slavery in this time period. With the final decision being the African Americans are not citizens, this case would be a precedent and one that would impact American for years to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Samuel Morse

Confederate Statues

In Class Mock Trial- 11/15 (Brown vs. Board)